Legal Opinion

Acme Marble & Granite Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 18, 1971No. C.D. 4187PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ee, Judge:

The legal question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of a 10 foot high white Carrara marble bas-relief plaque imported from Italy in 1962. The plaque depicts the Eesurrection of Christ from the sepulchre with Mary Magdalen at His feet. It was classified by the customs oflicials under paragraph 232(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, T.D. 54108, as marble wholly or partly manufactured, and assessed with duty at the rate of 21 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiff has protested and claims that the merchandise is properly…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Benziger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Daprato Statuary Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Gasparri Studios v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  4. John Horvath Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  5. Massachusetts General Hospital v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  2. Kurt Orban Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API