Legal Opinion

People v. Byard

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 2005No. Docket 249519PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaad, J.

Defendant appeals from a restitution order that required him to pay $659,128.09 in restitution to Allstate Insurance Company and $280,000 in restitution to the victim. Defendant agreed to make full restitution as part of a nolo contendere plea to operating a vehicle while visibly impaired due to the consumption of alcohol and causing a serious impairment of a body function. We affirm, but remand for further proceedings as discussed below.

i

We typically review a trial court’s order of restitution for an abuse of discretion. People v Newton, 257 Mich App 61, 68; 665 NW2d 504 (2003). However,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. WhiteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. GahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. NewtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. People v. OrwellerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. BellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. People v. BellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People of Michigan v. Jeffrey Alan StoltzMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. People of Michigan v. Kemo Knicombi ParksMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. People of Michigan v. Marti James SchraubenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API