Miller v. Infinite Percent Partners LLC
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LISA MILLER, Case No. 20-cv-02253-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 34 10 INFINITE PERCENT PARTNERS LLC, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 34, and Plaintiff’s 14 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 32. Plaintiff also requests leave to amend her 15 complaint. Dkt. No. 46. For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the 16 request for leave to amend is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 17 I.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.