Legal Opinion
Sharp v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided September 26, 1984No. 164-82PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON COURT’S MOTION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
McCORMICK, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of possession of methamphetamine, wherein the court assessed punishment of five years’ confinement, probated. The Ninth Supreme Judicial District Court of Appeals, Beaumont, affirmed in Sharp v. State, 628 S.W.2d 138 (Tex.App.—Beaumont, 1982). We granted discretionary review without petition on this Court’s own motion,1 to review the Court of Appeals’ determination that a deputy municipal court clerk is authorized under Texas law to issue a capias writ commanding the arrest…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Curry v. GrayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Stephen C. Crane, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. State of Texas v. County of Dallas, Ben Ellis, John Orvis, Mike Schwille, Berlaind Brashear and Chuck Miller, Defendants-Appellants-Cross v. Henry Wade and L. E. MurdochCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Crane v. TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.