Legal Opinion

Martin v. Martin, Martin & Richards, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 23, 1999No. 2-96-112-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

H. TOD WEAVER, Justice (Retired).

INTRODUCTION

This is a breach of contract ease. On original submission, we held that res judi-cata barred appellant’s claims. Martin v. Martin, Martin & Richards, Inc., 991 S.W.2d 1 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1997). The Texas Supreme Court held that, under the facts of this case, the claims were not barred. Thus, that court reversed and remanded the case to this court for consideration of the remaining issues. Martin v. Martin, Martin & Richards, Inc., 989 S.W.2d 357 (Tex.1998). We now consider those remaining issues. In so doing, we determine that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cotten v. Weatherford Bancshares, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Sneed v. WebreTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Plotkin v. Joekel, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
  4. Parker v. Dodge, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  5. In Re the Estate of Treviño, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API