Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Stuyvesant Safe Deposit Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1886Published

1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.

The defendants are a corporation created by chapter 111 of the Laws of 1877. By section 2 of the act the defendant was authorized to receive on deposit, as bailee, for safe keeping and storage, jewelry, plate and other articles of personal property, specially described, for such compensation as might be agreed upon, and also to let out vaults and safes and other receptacles for the uses and purposes of the corporation.

On the 20th of July, 1873, the plaintiff hired, for the period of one year, one of the defendant’s safes. A key to the safe was given to her, and only she, or her husband, as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Day v. . BachNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. United States v. GraffNew York Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Montgomery v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1876
  5. Whitaker v. MerrillNew York Supreme Court · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API