Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 15, 1876PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Trespass and Trover for thirteen yearling cattle. Pleas, the general issue, and justification under process. Trial by the court, June Term, 1874, Pecx, J., presiding.

Read the full summary

Trespass and Trover for thirteen yearling cattle. Pleas, the general issue, and justification under process. Trial by the court, June Term, 1874, Pecx, J., presiding. It appeared that on the 5th of September, 1870, the defendants, Wilson and Perrin, placed in the hands of J. Q. A. Bass, a deputy sheriff within and for the county of Orange, four lawful writs of attachment against said Montgomery, returnable before a justice of the peace; that said sheriff, with said writs in his possession, accompanied by said Wilson and Perrin, who were the attorneys for the plaintiffs in said writs (said…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Barrett, J.

To the judgment for $40 damages, no exception was taken. This aspect of the case presented by the bill of exceptions, assumes that the taking of the cattle by the defendants at Rochester, was not, in legal effect, an attachment of them by the sheriff holding the .writs against Montgomery, but that such taking was wrongful as against Montgomery. This suit is brought in that view, and on the same-assumption. It follows then, that Montgomery’s relation of ownership of the property was not affected by what the defendants did; and the property…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grisham v. BodmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Engelke & Feiner Milling Co. v. GrunthalSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  3. Morgan v. Kidder & RobinsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1883
  4. Huning v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Roberts v. Stuyvesant Safe Deposit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API