Legal Opinion
American Electric Power Service Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 26, 2013No. 11-1146PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge:
Section 224 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 224, provides a variety of advantages to certain types of firms seeking to attach their wires, cable, or other network equipment to utility poles. The Federal Communications Commission, which is charged with applying § 224, in 2011 made three revisions to its interpretation of the statute. In the Matter of Implementation of Section 221 of the Act, Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 26 FCC Red. 5240 (April 7, 2011) (“Order”). The Order (1) for the first time allows incumbent local exchange…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Helvering v. Morgan's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mozilla Corporation v. FCCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- American Meat Institute v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- City of Portland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Ameren Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Southwest Power Pool, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.