Legal Opinion
Sondik v. Kimmel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 16, 2015No. 2013-07373PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages pursuant to Civil Rights Law §§ 50 and 51 for invasion of the plaintiffs right of privacy, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated December 14, 2011, as granted those branches of the defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) which were to dismiss the first, second, third, and fifth causes of action.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff commenced this action seeking to recover damages for the nonconsensual…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cooney v. Osgood Machinery, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Padula v. Lilarn Properties Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Messenger v. Gruner + Jahr Printing & PublishingNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Kane v. Orange County PublicationsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Hampton v. GuareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Trec v. CazaresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Travelsavers Enterprises, Inc. v. Analog Analytics, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- In Re: Clearview AI, Inc., Consumer Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- In Re: Clearview AI, Inc., Consumer Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- In Re: Clearview AI, Inc., Consumer Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022