Legal Opinion
Inselberg v. Trosty
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided September 11, 1947PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParella, J.
I feel that this matter falls within the purview of the decision of Mr. Justice Valente in Baron v. Newgass (N. Y. L. J., Feb. 3, 1934, p. 577, col. 4, affd. 241 App. Div. 857) in which the law of absolute privilege was extended to a letter written by counsel for one party to counsel for the other party seeking to obtain the withdrawal of service of papers, without •the necessity of a motion, on the ground that if made the basis of a motion to vacate the service it would have been absolutely privileged.
The remarks complained of, had they been made orally in open court in connection with the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Andrews v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Byam v. . CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Marsh v. . EllsworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Moore v. Manufacturers' National Bank of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- People Ex Rel. Bensky v. Warden of the City PrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Zamarello v. YaleAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Robinson v. Home Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- Simon v. PottsNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Abrams v. Crompton-Richmond Co.New York Supreme Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.