Legal Opinion

Norman v. Hynes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 5, 2005PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

This is a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition against the District Attorney of Kings County and the Supreme Court Justice presiding over the case of People v Clarence Norman, Jr. As such, it originates in this Court (see CPLR 7804 [b]; 506 [b] [1]). We are not called upon or authorized in this proceeding to pass on the question of whether or not the evidence is legally sufficient to support the charges against the petitioner, Clarence Norman, Jr. We only examine *127whether the prosecution is barred because it breaches the separation of powers…

3Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Rush v. MordueNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Holtzman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. VallesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. People v. LancasterNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rubin v. GarvinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Sharkey v. Town of Southold Justice CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Prospect v. DoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. People v. HeadleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API