Legal Opinion
In RE WHITE v. Schneckloth
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 5, 1960No. 34128PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
56 Wn.2d 173 (1960)
351 P.2d 919
In the Matter of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of TOMMY WHITE, Petitioner,
v.
MERLE E. SCHNECKLOTH, as Superintendent of the State Penitentiary, Respondent.[1]
No. 34128.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
May 5, 1960.
The Attorney General and Michael R. Alfieri, Assistant, for respondent.
WEAVER, C.J.
December 13, 1950, petitioner Tommy White was charged by amended information that stated he,
"... on or about October 28, 1950, within Yakima County, Washington, then and there being, did then and there, under circumstances not amounting to assault in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- State v. PaulWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- In RE WESLEY v. SchnecklothWashington Supreme Court · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BertrandWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- In RE ARQUETTE v. SchnecklothWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Writ of Habeas Corpus of Arquette v. SchnecklothWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Department of Labor & Industries v. SargeantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980