Legal Opinion

Writ of Habeas Corpus of Arquette v. Schneckloth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1960No. 34126PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, C. J.

— Calvin Arquette was charged with the intentional taking of an automobile without the permission of the owner. RCW 9.54.020. He waived counsel, pleaded guilty, and was sentenced to the penitentiary for a period of not more than ten years. No challenge was then made to the jurisdiction of the superior court.

Calvin Arquette filed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this court and alleged that he

“ . . . is an unemancipated Indian of the United States and a member of the Yakima Tribe of the State of Washington . . . ”

and that

“. . . the purported crime as charged against your petitioner…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Franklin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. State v. PaulWashington Supreme Court · 1959

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In RE ARQUETTE v. SchnecklothWashington Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API