Legal Opinion

KIRKHAM v. TAXACT, INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 2024No. 2:23-cv-03303Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMES KIRKHAM et al. CIVIL ACTION Plaintiffs, v. TAXACT, INC., NO. 23-3303 Defendant. OPINION Plaintiffs James Kirkham and Matthew Sessoms have sued the tax preparer company TaxAct, Inc. (“TaxAct”), alleging, on behalf of two classes of similarly situated customers, that the company shared their confidential personal information with Meta and Google, in violation of federal tax law,

26 U.S.C. §§ 6103, 7431(a)(2), and Pennsylvania’s Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act, 18 Pa. C.S. § 5701 et seq. Relying…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API