Legal Opinion

Nat Villiam Wright v. State of North Carolina and David Henry, Warden, State's Prison

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 2, 1973No. 72-1475PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge:

In this habeas proceeding, a North Carolina prisoner, convicted of rape, 1 challenges the constitutional admissibility of an inculpatory statement secured from him shortly after his arrest. There is no dispute that the petitioner was given a warning — in fact, two warnings — before his statement was taken. It is the petitioner’s contention that the warning as given was inadequate in form itself to advise him adequately of his rights as mandated by Miranda; 2 he goes further and urges that, even if the warning were technically sufficient in form to satisfy…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Ashcraft v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. LaVallee v. Delle RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Duckworth v. EaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. Donald Eugene Parker, United States of America v. Nicholas FaitheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. Poyner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  4. Hakeem v. BeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Hakeem v. BeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API