Legal Opinion

United States v. Aho

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 2, 1943No. Nos. 1337, 1421, 1650PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge.

These three actions were brought by the United States to appropriate three different parcels of land. The opinion will deal with all, since, in each, similar problems are presented. In each, the United States has filed a “Petition for Condemnation”. In each case, an answer has been filed by a Drainage District, which was joined in the petition as a defendant in the proceeding. Each of the answers alleges that the particular parcel sought to be acquired is within the boundaries of the answering district, which seeks to be compensated because it can no longer…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. John K. & Catherine S. Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Smith v. Oregon Short Line Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1893
  3. United States v. Wheeler Tp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  4. Town of Bedford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927
  5. State Ex Rel. Kendall v. MohlerOregon Supreme Court · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Certain Lands Located in Highlands, Woodbury & CornwallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API