Legal Opinion

DAVIS-EL v. ADAMS

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 6, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00813Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRANDON DAVIS-EL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 2:24-813 ) v. ) Judge Cathy Bissoon ) R. SCOTT ADAMS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM ORDER OF DISMISSAL Having been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), Plaintiff is subject to the screening provisions in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). See Atamian v. Burns,

236 F. App’x 753, 755

(3d Cir. 2007) (“[T]he screening procedures set forth in [Section] 1915(e) apply to [IFP] complaints filed by prisoners and non-prisoners alike.”) (citations omitted). Among other…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mark D. Tourscher v. Martin Horn, Secretary of the Pa. Dept. Of Corrections John McCullough Superintendent ,(d.c. Civil No. 98-Cv-00176j)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. Tabron v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. Evancho v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  4. Atamian v. BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. Untracht v. FikriDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API