Legal Opinion
City of Orlando v. Udowychenko
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 6, 2012No. 5D11-720PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RECKSIEDLER, J.J., Associate Judge.
The City of Orlando and Lasercraft, Inc., appeal a final judgment in favor of Michael Udowyehenko that invalidated the City’s red light camera ordinance as preempted by state law. This court affirms the lower court’s decision and certifies conflict with the decision made by the Third District Court of Appeal in City of Aventura v. Masone, 89 So.3d 233 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (motion for rehearing, motion for rehearing en banc, and request for certified question denied March 6, 2012).
On December 17, 2007, the City enacted its “Red Light Infractions” ordinance…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Mendenhall v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. Family Bank of HallandaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- City of Davenport v. SeymourSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Richard Masone v. City of AventuraSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
- Damon v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State Ex Rel. City of Aventura v. JimenezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- City of Oldsmar v. TrinhDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Easter v. City of OrlandoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.