Legal Opinion

Richard Masone v. City of Aventura

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 12, 2014No. SC12-1471, SC12-644PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*494CANADY, J.

In these consolidated cases, we consider whether municipal ordinances imposing penalties for red light violations detected by devices using cameras were invalid because they were preempted by state law. At issue in these cases is the operation of ordinances prior to July 1, 2010, the effective date of the Mark Wandall Traffic Safety Act, ch.2010-80, Laws of Fla., which authorized — subject to statutory requirements — the use of red light traffic infraction detectors by local governments and the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles.

In City of Aventura v. Masone, 89…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barragan v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. City of Hollywood v. MulliganSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  4. Sarasota Alliance for Fair Elections, Inc. v. BrowningSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  5. City of Palm Bay v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Florida · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Club Madonna Inc. v. City of Miami BeachCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
  2. City of Hollywood, a political subdivision of the State of Florida v. Eric AremDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Luis Torres Jimenez v. State of Florida, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2018
  4. State Ex Rel. City of Aventura v. JimenezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. D'Agastino v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2017

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API