Legal Opinion

Richard Harry McDonough v. Government Employees Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 27, 1972No. 71-1026Published

1Per curiam

Richard H. McDonough, appellant, seeks reversal of a judgment based upon a jury verdict in favor of his automobile insurance carrier and against him in this excess suit brought by him against the company. Jurisdiction was based upon 28 U.S.C. § 1332, diversity of citizenship.

McDonough was involved in a two-car accident on November 16, 1963, outside Fairbanks, Alaska. In a personal injury action resulting, a jury in 1965 returned a verdict against McDonough and in favor of Mr. Lee and Mrs. Lee, occupants of the other vehicle. Mr. Lee recovered $12,000 and Mrs. Lee, $300,761.70. Government…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kettenbach v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
  2. The United States of America v. Nicholas A. StironeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  3. Insurance Company of North America, a Corporation v. Thomas J. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  4. Albert L. Hametner v. Andres M. Villena, Hawaiian Rock Products and National Union Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API