Legal Opinion

STK Enterprises, Inc. v. Crusader Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 15, 2000No. 9709-07387; CA A102476PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Plaintiff operates The Refectory, a restaurant and bar in Portland. In this case, it seeks to recover from defendant, its insurer, the cost of defending and settling three customers’ claims of racial discrimination. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, ORCP 47, and plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

We first consider plaintiffs claims for the costs of defending the claims. To determine whether an insurer has a duty to defend an action against its insured, we compare two documents, the complaint filed against the insured and the insurance policy. If the complaint alleges…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Ledford v. GutoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Groshong v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Z.R.L. Corp. v. Great Central InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. American Hardware Insurance v. West One Automotive Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harleysville Preferred Ins. Co. v. Rams Head Savage Mill, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Westfield Insurance Group v. J.P.'s Wharf, Ltd.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  3. Century Surety Co. v. Seductions, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
  4. Grand China Buffett & Grill, Inc. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2017
  5. Spada v. Unigard InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API