Legal Opinion

Musinski v. Harran Transportation Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Sears, Roebuck and Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Shaughnessy, J.), dated November 8, 1990, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it for failure to state a cause of action, or for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, *805the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as it is asserted against Sears, Roebuck and Company,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Waters v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Kulier v. Harran Transportation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Parker v. D/U Third Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Patricia B. v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kulier v. Harran Transportation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API