Legal Opinion

Turner v. Codd

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNathaniel T. Helman, J.

Motion for a preliminary injunction and for the declaration of a class action is disposed of as follows:

The named plaintiffs are applicants for "on premises” pistol licenses. Two of the applications have thus far not been acted upon. The other applicants have received notices that their applications were preliminarily disapproved on the sole ground of "Insufficient Need”.

Reliance is placed by plaintiffs on the recent holding of the Appellate Division, First Department, in the case of Shapiro v Cawley (46 AD2d 633), to the effect that for an "on-premises” *484pistol license, no requirement exists…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. GallupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  2. Matter of Moore v. GallupNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Shapiro v. CawleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Evans v. City of JohnstownNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Archibald v. CoddNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  3. David B. Lee & Co. v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Hochreich v. CoddNew York Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API