Legal Opinion

Dingman v. Boyle

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1918No. 12109PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Writ or Error to the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Sheridan F. Fry, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

The municipal court of Chicago entered judgment in favor of defendant in error, George W. Dingman, against plaintiff in error, Lawrence P. Boyle, for $1500, for commissions on a real estate transaction. The Appellate Court for the First District affirmed that judgment, and the case has been brought to this court by petition for certiorari.

On May 15, 1916, the estate of George A. Springer was the owner of certain real estate on Forest avenue, in Chicago, improved with eight residences, and plaintiff in error, Boyle, was the owner of a building used for apartments, stores and offices at the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. MasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurance on Lives v. BauerleIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Morville v. FowleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  4. Coleman v. ConnollyIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Gary v. NewtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dunklin v. RamsaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Stuart v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Estate of Greenberg v. SugarmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  4. Terry Dunker v. George ReichmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  5. Nichols v. PospiechMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API