Legal Opinion

State v. Morales

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 5, 2010No. 36941-9-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

¶1 Jose Matilde Morales appeals his jury convictions for vehicular assault and driving under the influence. He argues that (1) the trial court erroneously admitted his blood alcohol test results because the State failed to show that he was advised of his statutory right to an independent blood test under RCW 46.20.308(2);1 (2) the trial court erroneously admitted beer containers found *31during an allegedly illegal search of his vehicle; and (3) the evidence was insufficient to establish that he operated his motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicants and that he operated his vehicle in a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MoralesWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. State v. MoralesWashington Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API