Legal Opinion

State v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 25, 2010No. 63168-3-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.

¶1 A jury convicted Eric Roberts of possession of cocaine found during a search of his car. For the first time on appeal, Roberts argues that under the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332, 129 S. Ct. 1710, 173 L. Ed. 2d 485 (2009), the search violated his constitutional rights under the Fourth *177Amendment and article I, section 7 of the Washington State Constitution. Roberts concedes there were two plausible grounds for the police to search his car, a search incident to arrest and an inventory search, but asserts that the record shows the primary purpose of the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. AbuanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  2. State v. AbuanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. State v. SwetzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. State v. SwetzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. State Of Washington, V. Stephen Wayne CanterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API