Morris v. Capitol Furniture & Appliance Co.

PAIR, Associate Judge:

Appellee filed a suit against appellant for $406 representing the balance due for household effects purchased under a conditional sales contract. By her amended anr swer, appellant alleged that the goods were grossly overpriced; that she had already paid their fair market value; and that the contract terms were so unconscionable as to entitle her to a setoff of the balance of the purchase price.

It appearing that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment; appellant urging, in addition to her claim of…