Legal Opinion

Coast Fir Lumber Co. v. Parker

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

The defendants complain because the court permitted George E. Miller to testify as to *647the meaning of: “Terms regular,” and “when 60 days,” found in the instrument of November 24, 1919. In substance, the witness explained that the terms mentioned had respectively, according to general and uniform usage of the lumber trade, certain, definite and universally understood meanings, and that these meanings were as alleged in the complaint. Miller explained that in preparing contracts the word “regular” is sometimes used, at other times “90% advance” is employed, and sometimes the words “West Coast”…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Savage v. Salem Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Shaw Wholesale Co. v. HackbarthOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Simms v. SullivanOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Holmes v. WhitakerOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Indianapolis Cabinet Co. v. HerrmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burton v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Green Mountain Log Co. v. Columbia & Nehalem River RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  3. M. Lowenstein & Sons v. Noon Bag Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API