Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Wright

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1934No. 28733PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This was an action brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for the wrongful death of her son as the result of a collision between the Ford sedan driven by him and the defendant’s truck. The defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a verdict is questioned. An examination of the evidence discloses that, upon the question of the negligence of both parties, there is evidence very much in conflict. The evidence is such that reasonable minds might draw different conclusions as to the comparative negligence of the parties. In such a case,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morris v. ErskineNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Day v. Metropolitan Utilities DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Christensen v. TateNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Casey v. Ford Motor Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Clausen v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Remmenga v. SelkNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Moncrief v. Interstate Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Parks v. MetzNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Rogers v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Clarke v. WeatherlyNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API