Legal Opinion

People v. Arrellano

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided April 17, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lee Cross, J.

The defendant’s motion for discovery of the names, addresses and dates of birth of the civilian witnesses who may be called by the People is granted.

NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF WITNESSES

The Court of Appeals has not definitively decided whether it is within a Trial Judge’s discretion to grant a defense request for the names and addresses of the People’s witnesses. (People v Andre W., 44 NY2d 179 [1978].) The First Department has said that ordering such disclosure is within a Judge’s discretion and, "absent compelling circumstances such as the danger of intimidation,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. SorgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. People v. CopicottoNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. People v. OcasioNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Vergari v. KendallNew York Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. BiancoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1996
  2. People ex rel. Nelson v. Warden of Brooklyn House of DetentionNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. RodriguezNew York Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API