Civils v. First National Bank
Idaho Supreme Court
1Dissent
TAYLOR, J.,
Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part. — I concur in the main opinion except in the holding, directly or by inference, that, after default of a husband, the wife may later defend .a right of the husband lost by such default, in the absence .of a showing that the husband neglected to defend, and that the husband can inherit from his wife the right to attack his own default judgment through such inheritance, without even a showing of negligence. So to hold is to reason in a circle.
I think a defense by the wile of the right of the husband, under the statute, on “neglect” of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Shoemaker v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1883