Shoemaker v. Collins
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Berrien. Bill to enjoin proceedings in ejectment, and to nullify decree of foreclosure. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
This bill was filed to protect a homestead right in forty acres of land. It appears that the complainant, William Shoemaker, who was a married man, and was living upon an eighty-acre lot of land, which included the forty now in question, gave a mortgage of the whole to secure a debt which has never been paid. Louisa Shoemaker, his wife, who was joined as complainant in filing the bill, *597did not unite in the mortgage. The mortgage was subsequently foreclosed in equity, in a suit in which William Shoemaker was defendant, but in which the wife was not joined. The purchaser under that foreclosure…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sherrid v. SouthwickMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dikeman v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Kelly v. MosbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Hall v. Powell Et UxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Lawrence v. VinkemulderMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Civils v. First National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.