Legal Opinion

Shoemaker v. Collins

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Berrien. Bill to enjoin proceedings in ejectment, and to nullify decree of foreclosure. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This bill was filed to protect a homestead right in forty acres of land. It appears that the complainant, William Shoemaker, who was a married man, and was living upon an eighty-acre lot of land, which included the forty now in question, gave a mortgage of the whole to secure a debt which has never been paid. Louisa Shoemaker, his wife, who was joined as complainant in filing the bill, *597did not unite in the mortgage. The mortgage was subsequently foreclosed in equity, in a suit in which William Shoemaker was defendant, but in which the wife was not joined. The purchaser under that foreclosure…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sherrid v. SouthwickMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dikeman v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Kelly v. MosbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Hall v. Powell Et UxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  4. Lawrence v. VinkemulderMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Civils v. First National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API