Legal Opinion
Lemy v. Direct General Finance Co.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided August 14, 2012No. Case No. 8:11-cv-2722-T-23AEPPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, District Judge.
Gardith Lemy and Marilyn Hill sued eleven defendants (“the insurers”) for allegedly selling worthless and illegal surplus line automobile insurance. In this order two of the eleven will presently need the distinction of a name: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s (the surplus line insurer) and Direct General (the producing agent). Dismissing the action, a June 19, 2012 885 F.Supp.2d 1265, 2012 WL 2339702 (M.D.Fla.2012), order (Doc. 125) concludes (1) that the policy Lemy and Hill each bought (“the Policy”) sufficiently complies with the Florida insurance…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hucke v. Kubra Data Transfer Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
- Hill v. National Insurance Underwriters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016