Legal Opinion

Coppinger v. Coppinger

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 2, 2003No. 00-P-1197Published

1Opinion of the CourtTrainor, J.

Janice Coppinger (wife) appeals a Probate Court contempt judgment which, in effect, reduced the amount of weekly alimony owed to her by Daniel Coppinger (husband) pursuant to their divorce judgment, and which awarded her substantially less in attorney’s fees than she had requested. Because the judge failed to make the findings necessary to sup*710port modification of the husband’s alimony obligation, we vacate that portion of the contempt judgment and reinstate the husband’s prior obligation. We also remand for reconsideration and entry of findings concerning the attorney’s fees award.

1. Facts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Knox v. RemickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Davidson v. DavidsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. Stansel v. StanselMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Bush v. BushMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  5. Kennedy v. KennedyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API