State of Maine v. Nathan P. Tarbox
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
[¶ 1] Nathan P. Tarbox appeals from a judgment of conviction entered by the trial court (York County, Douglas, J.) after a jury found him guilty of domestic violence assault (Class C), 17-A M.R.S. §§ 207-A(1)(A), 1252(4-A) (2016), and obstructing the report of a crime or injury (Class D), 17-A M.R.S. § 758(1)(A) (2016). Tarbox contends that the trial court erred by not sua sponte declaring a mistrial when the prosecutor commented on Tarbox’s right not to testify during the State’s rebuttal closing argument. In addition, Tarbox argues that the court erred by denying his motions for a mistrial…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. DolloffSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- State v. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Jesse Forrestal, Etc. v. Henry G. MagendantzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- State v. LockhartSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- State v. HarnishSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State of Maine v. Eric NoblesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- State of Maine v. Jomo WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022
- State of Maine v. Sharon CarrilloSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
- State of Maine v. Antoinne BetheaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- State of Maine v. Michael G. CunneenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.