Ingram v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
COMBS, Justice.
By a multi-count indictment, appellant Ingram was charged with three offenses involving the sale, and possession for intended sale, of marijuana. In a single trial, he was found guilty on all counts. Two of those convictions constitute the subject matter of this review, which presents the question of whether Ingram has been twice put in jeopardy for the same offense, in violation of Kentucky Constitution § 13.
The factual premise is simple. Ingram— an adult — sold two1 marijuana cigarettes to a minor. This exchange happened to occur within one thousand yards of a school…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BurgeKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. WassonKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
- Perdue v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
- Eldred v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1995
- Walden v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.