Legal Opinion

Quintana v. State Board of Education

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1970No. 417PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

We dismiss this appeal from the State Board of Education because neither this court nor the State Board had jurisdiction, that is, authority to decide the particular matter presented. See Heckathorn v. Heckathorn, 77 N.M. 369, 423 P.2d 410 (1967) and Elwess v. Elwess, 73 N.M. 400, 389 P.2d 7 (1964) for this jurisdictional concept.

Eloy P. Quintana, with “tenure rights” under § 77-8-11, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 11, pt. 1) was serving as a school principal. The Local Board (Board of Education, Española Municipal Schools) did not re-employ Quintana as a principal for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heckathorn v. HeckathornNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Tijerina v. BakerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Elwess v. ElwessNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Brown v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Board of Education, Penasco Independent School District No. 4 v. RodriguezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Redman v. BD. OF REGENTS OF NEW MEXICONew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Franco v. Carlsbad Municipal SchoolsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Phoenix Funding, LLC v. Aurora Loan Services, LLCNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Bertrand v. New Mexico State Board of EducationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Hayden v. LeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API