Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Miller

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 13, 1965No. File 108146PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKlau, J.

The defendant General Motors Corporation demurs to the third count of the complaint on the ground that no cause of action for breach of the warranty may lie against this defendant, as no privity exists between the plaintiff’s decedent and said defendant.

This is an action for damages arising from injuries which resulted in the death of Burnell R. Mitchell, the decedent of the plaintiff executrix, allegedly caused by the defendants Nancy Backman, her father, Horace G. Miller, Wallingford Country Club, Inc., and General Motors Corporation. The allegations of the first count are based on the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  5. Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Darryl v. Ford Motor CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Elmore v. American Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Winnett v. WinnettIllinois Supreme Court · 1974

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API