Legal Opinion

Wypchoski v. Berg, No. Cv97 0059212s (Feb. 19, 1998)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 19, 1998No. CV97 0059212SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The plaintiff brought an action against the defendants in three counts and the second count is based on a claim of easement by prescription. Basically, the plaintiff claims the right to use a certain right of way which the defendants have now fenced off so that he has no access to his garage. The defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment directed towards this second count. The court will discuss the relevant facts during its opinion.

By…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Feldman Et Ux. v. Knapp Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Zollinger v. FrankUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Klein v. DeRosaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. Horowitz v. F. E. Spencer Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  5. Hodgkins v. BianchiniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API