Hodgkins v. Bianchini
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
The plaintiffs in these proceedings seek a declaratory decree to determine their rights and those of the defendants in certain land in Rockport, hereinafter called the “Lane.” The case was referred to a master and his report, to which there were no objections, was confirmed by an interlocutory decree entered by consent of the parties. The case comes here on the defendants’ appeal from a final decree.
Facts found by the master include the following: The plaintiffs are the owners of land which includes a parcel called the “Lane.” The “Lane” is the sole means of access to the public highway…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Parsons v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Swensen v. MarinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Guillet v. LivernoisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Sullivan v. DonohoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Short v. DevineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Casella v. SneiersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Jones Et Ux v. Edwards Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Western Massachusetts Electric Co. v. Sambo's of Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Jackson v. KnottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Rowe v. LavanwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.