People v. Remington
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
The appellant Remington and one Shevlin were jointly charged with the crime of robbery. Remington, who was found guilty as charged, appeals from the judgment of conviction and likewise from an order denying him a new trial.
It is charged in the indictment that the two defendants, armed with a pistol, a dangerous and deadly weapon, feloniously and through the use of force and fear took from the possession and immediate presence of one P. N. Fox the sum of $6,373, lawful money of the United States, which belonged to the First National Bank of Watts. The robbery, which seemingly °is conceded to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. PeeteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. WhalenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. WadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. BurdgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Burton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1959
- People v. BonnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.