Legal Opinion

Diffenderfer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 19, 1994PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

Before us is the appeal of Charles M. Diffenderfer (Claimant) from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed a referee’s decision dismissing Claimant’s petition to reinstate his total disability benefits after the exhaustion of partial disability benefits.

Claimant sustained a work-related injury to his back in 1976 for which he received total disability benefits pursuant to a notice of compensation payable issued by Rabestos Manhatten, Inc. (Employer). Later that year he returned to work in a light-duty position and was paid partial disability benefits…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Busche v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Scobbie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Volk v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Meden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Harper & Collins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. McKay v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Stanek v. Worker's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Stewart v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Trumbull v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API