Legal Opinion

Calvert v. House Beautiful Paint and Decorating Center, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 25, 1994No. 24052PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Acting Chief Justice:

We granted a writ a certiorari to review the Court of Appeals memorandum decision in this slip and fall case. We reverse.

FACTS

Petitioner (House Beautiful) operates a small retail paint store that has only three aisles. Respondent (Calvert) was a customer in the store when he slipped and fell on a slick substance in the paint base aisle. The record indicates the following facts.

Victor Carilli, the store owner, opened the store about an hour and a half before Calvert’s fall. Only one or two customers came into the store that morning. It was Carilli’s habit to make…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wimberley v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  2. Anderson v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  3. Byers v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wintersteen v. Food Lion, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Brown v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Middleborough Horizontal Property Regime Council of Co-Owners v. Montedison S.P.A.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Force Ex Rel. Estate of Force v. Richland Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Wintersteen v. Food Lion, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API