Calvert v. House Beautiful Paint and Decorating Center, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Chandler, Acting Chief Justice:
We granted a writ a certiorari to review the Court of Appeals memorandum decision in this slip and fall case. We reverse.
FACTS
Petitioner (House Beautiful) operates a small retail paint store that has only three aisles. Respondent (Calvert) was a customer in the store when he slipped and fell on a slick substance in the paint base aisle. The record indicates the following facts.
Victor Carilli, the store owner, opened the store about an hour and a half before Calvert’s fall. Only one or two customers came into the store that morning. It was Carilli’s habit to make…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wimberley v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
- Anderson v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
- Byers v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wintersteen v. Food Lion, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Brown v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Middleborough Horizontal Property Regime Council of Co-Owners v. Montedison S.P.A.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- Force Ex Rel. Estate of Force v. Richland Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Wintersteen v. Food Lion, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.