Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Mason

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

We shall not review in detail the evidence as to the misrepresentations. The price at which the land in question was sold was itself so grossly excessive as to indicate misconduct on the part of the defendants. The findings of the court are sustained by the evidence and no useful purpose will be served by a detailed review thereof.

As already indicated, this was an action for rescission. In an action for rescission where the judgment grants the *116relief prayed for, the parties should be placed as nearly as possible in statu quo. This does not mean that the parties are to be restored to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knudson v. GeorgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Burk v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Seidling v. Unichem, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Head & Seemann, Inc. v. GreggCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  4. Thrams v. BlockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Hammac v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API