Moses v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion
UPON REHEARING EN BANC
D. ARTHUR KELSEY, Judge.
Kenneth Samuel Moses challenges his conviction on two counts of making an obscene display or exposure in violation of Code § 18.2-387. Finding no error in the trial court’s application of the statute to this case, we affirm.
I
On appeal, we review the evidence in the “light most favorable” to the Commonwealth. Commonwealth v. Hudson, 265 Va. 505, 514, 578 S.E.2d 781, 786 (2003). That principle requires us to “ ‘discard the evidence of the accused in conflict with that of the Commonwealth, and regard as true all the credible evidence favorable to the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Commonwealth v. HudsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
- Parks v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
- Wicks v. City of CharlottesvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
- Cook v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
- Washington v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
- Rowland v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2011
- Wisneski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Leo Ricardo Barnes v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.