Legal Opinion

Washington v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided August 9, 2005No. Record No. 1734-03-4PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UPON REHEARING EN BANC

KELSEY, Judge.

Phillip Morris Washington challenges his conviction for malicious wounding “after having been twice convicted of a violent felony” in violation of Code § 18.2-51 and § 19.2-297.1. On appeal, Washington contends that the trial judge erred in permitting the Commonwealth to prove his two prior robbery convictions during the guilt phase of the bifurcated trial. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

I

Prior to trial, Washington filed a motion in limine to prohibit the prosecutor from introducing evidence of his two prior robbery convictions…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. McBoyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Alabama v. SheltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. People v. . SicklesNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Ansell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Washington v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  2. Uninsured Employer's Fund v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  3. Virginia Retirement System v. Ricky A. BlairCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
  4. Steven Lee Hodges v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
  5. South v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API