Legal Opinion

Reddy v. Abitbol

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided January 7, 2020No. 5:19-cv-01493Unknown

1Opinion

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DEEPIKA REDDY, Plaintiff, v. 5:19-CV-1493 (MAD/ATB) GILLES R. R. ABITBOL, ESQ., et al., Defendants. DEEPIKA REDDY, Plaintiff, pro se ANDREW T. BAXTER United States Magistrate Judge ORDER and REPORT-RECOMMENDATION Presently before the court is a pro se complaint which was transferred from the Southern District of New York. (Complaint (“Compl.”)) (Dkt. No. 1, 2, 19, 20). Plaintiff has paid the filing fee. Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”),

18 U.S.C. § 1961

et seq. and various state law causes of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Shirley Small v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API