Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Arnold

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 24, 2018No. Appellate Case No. 2016-000398; Opinion No. 5531Published

1Opinion of the Court

*257GEATHERS, J.:

**164In this child custody action, Brooke L. Arnold (Mother) seeks review of the family court's order awarding Maxie **165Burgess (Father) primary custody of their eight-year-old son (Son) should Mother relocate to Florida. Mother argues the family court erred by (1) creating a custody arrangement that penalizes Mother for relocating to Florida; (2) applying an initial custody analysis rather than a change-in-circumstances analysis; and (3) imposing a joint custody arrangement based on a finding that the parties had been operating under a joint custody arrangement prior to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Patel v. PatelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. McAlister v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  4. Crossland v. CrosslandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  5. Latimer v. FarmerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API