Latimer v. Farmer
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Justice BURNETT:
This is a custody dispute arising out of the custodial parent’s relocation. Appellant Michelle Latimer Farmer (Mother) appeals the family court order concluding Respondent Daniel W. Farmer (Father) should be allowed to relocate with their adopted child (Child). Appellants Charlotte and Stuart Latimer (Grandparents) appeal the family court’s order denying them autonomous visitation rights with Child. We affirm.
FACTS
Mother and Father were married on June 4, 1988 and were divorced on February 11, 2000 because of Mother’s adultery with one John Case.
Approximately a year and a half…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- MATTER OF TROPEA v. TropeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re Marriage of BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Plum Creek Development Co. v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Davenport v. DavenportSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jaime Taormina Bisbing v. Glenn R. Bisbing, III (077533) (Sussex County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- Ex Parte MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- In re R.A.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Stone v. Roadway ExpressSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Tillman v. OakesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.