Railex Corp. v. Joseph Guss & Sons, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACKSON, District Judge.
This is a civil action under 35 U.S.C. § 281 for alleged infringement of plaintiff’s U. S. Patent No. 3,010, 584, issued November 28, 1961, and entitled “Article Storing and Delivering Apparatus with Inclined Article-Supporting Rack.” This Court previously denied plaintiff’s motion under Rule 39(b), F.R.Civ.P., for trial by jury and also denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment for plaintiff’s alleged failure to join an indispensable party. Railex Corp. v. Joseph Guss and Sons, Inc., 40 F.R.D. 119 (D.D.C. 1966). After one full day of trial and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Edwin L. Reynolds, Acting Commissioner of Patents v. Elie P. AghnidesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Railex Corp. v. Joseph Guss & Sons, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1966
- Application of Jack H. HofstetterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Application of Richard E. Warner and Virginia Ann WarnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Railex Corporation v. Joseph Guss & Sons, Inc., and G. A. Braun, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Application of Richard E. Warner and Virginia Ann WarnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Sikora v. BrennerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966